VProGo

Getting your facility ready…

VProGo vs Dazos

Everything Dazos does.
In one platform.

Dazos sells six products to run your facility, CRM, IQ, iCampaign, iVerify, Marketing Reports, and Billing CRM. VProGo delivers all of it under one roof, plus the clinical operations layer and bidirectional clearinghouse Dazos doesn't touch.

Feature-by-feature, side by side

The capability comparison, grounded in public Dazos product info and our own shipping codebase. No customer names. No vendor-pitch math.

Bidirectional clearinghouse (Claim.MD and CollaborateMD live; Waystar in development)
Submit claims, receive ERAs, and act on denials in one place, not by reading PDF reports from someone else's clearinghouse.
VProGo
Dazos
EMR-agnostic (Kipu / Alleva / Sunwave / Opus / CareConnect + canonical layer)
Keep the EMR your clinicians know. If you switch EMRs later, the operations layer stays put, no re-platform.
VProGo
Dazos
Staff mobile + native push notifications
Both ship a staff app. VProGo runs as a Capacitor PWA with native iOS/Android push and works offline-first.
VProGo
Dazos
Patient-facing mobile app (recovery + alumni engagement)
vProMove gives patients in-program goals + alumni community after discharge. Owning the patient relationship matters at re-admission time.
VProGo
Dazos
Clinical-evidence trail attached to every claim
Two clicks from a denial to the unsigned group note that caused it. The chart and the dollar live in the same system.
VProGo
Dazos
Plug-and-play onboarding + white-glove migration
Out of the box on day one. Dazos's six-product suite + their academy is the cost of entry; VProGo aims to not need an academy.
VProGo
Dazos
AI briefing across census / referrals / billing
One daily digest pulls signal from every surface, what changed overnight, what needs attention, what's about to slip.
VProGo
Dazos
Multi-facility roll-up + cross-facility billing portal
Both handle multi-location. VProGo's billing portal is built for the case where one billing company services multiple facilities.
VProGo
Dazos
Outbound referrals + partner pipeline tracking
Standard table stakes for either platform. VProGo adds true partner attribution + per-partner P&L.
VProGo
Dazos
Live call attribution (CTM / CallRail / RingCentral)
Calls are tied back to a campaign source, then to a referral, then to an admission, then to a paid claim. End-to-end, not buckets.
VProGo
Dazos
In-app patient surveys + reviews management
Discharge surveys feed the alumni system. Reviews aren't outsourced to a third-party reputation vendor.
VProGo
Dazos
Month-to-month, no long-term contract required
If the platform isn't earning its keep, you can leave. The platform should keep proving itself, not the contract.
VProGo
Dazos

= partial / add-on / requires a third-party tool ·= not in current product surface as of 2026-05.

Three things to know

The differences that actually matter when you're comparing platforms.

Bidirectional clearinghouse, not "we read your reports"

VProGo ships native, bidirectional Claim.MD and CollaborateMD integrations today, with Waystar in development: claims out, ERAs and 277s back, denials and CARC codes routed into a worklist. Dazos's Billing CRM reads reports from whatever clearinghouse you already pay for. You still need the clearinghouse subscription separately.

A patient app that lives past discharge

vProMove is a Capacitor-built iOS/Android app for patients in program and alumni after. Daily goals, recovery resources, peer community, surveys. Dazos has a staff app on the App Store but nothing patient-facing. The alumni signal that drives readmissions and reviews has to live somewhere, yours is in your platform, not on a Facebook group someone forgot to moderate.

Three-tier drill from KPI to claim line + chart

Every revenue metric on the RM Hub dashboard drills: KPI → row-level side-out (patient ledger, partner P&L, evidence group) → ClaimDetailPanel with line items, CARC plain-language translation, ERA, and the clinical-evidence trail for the referral episode. The system owns both sides of the data, the claim and the chart that justifies it.

A few honest opinions

We're happy to compete on features. We'll also be honest about the patterns we don't want to copy.

No academy required

When your platform needs a dedicated training academy to use, that's the platform telling you something. VProGo is designed so a new admissions coordinator is productive on day one, not after a multi-week certification.

Month-to-month, not multi-year

Software that's good at its job keeps customers. Software that isn't needs long contracts. We default to month-to-month and bet that the platform will keep proving itself every month.

A coordinator, not a bot, answers the phone

AI is great for cleaning up notes, flagging at-risk patients, and surfacing the next-best action. It's a poor fit for the first conversation with someone deciding whether to enter treatment. VProGo's call workflow assumes a person on the other end of the line, not a screen-recording-trained voice agent.

See it run on your data

30-minute demo, walked through by the team that built it. We'll show you the features in this matrix on a real treatment-center facility, not a sandbox.